#1687255 - 02/11/09 04:12 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: denmah]
|
denmah
Stranger
Registered: 02/11/09
Posts: 5
Loc: allentown PA
|
let me explain, this is not my car, nor did i do the work on this car. my friend that owns a shop built the turbo kit for this car, for a customer. i love taking pics of his interesting projects and putting them on the internet for other people to see...
it has a 60mm turbo with a .82 exhaust (a little big, but its getting swapped out with a .68)
it has precision 42lb injectors and a marauder mafs, but that is topped out easily by the turbo. they are going to use a mafia extender to get more power out of the mass air meter.
it is totally stock motor throttle body to oilpan, 140k miles 2v.
the trans is the same way.
tuning is with SCT xcal.
they plan to put a pump in it also, and shoot for more power.
on 6psi it easily pegged the mafs and made 320rwhp the car made 206rwhp stock so it gained roughly 19hp per psi, pretty good for a turbo thats a bit too large.
more updates on it as they get more done, i will get some in car video also.
i dont know your rules on advertising so i will not post the name of the shop or try to dress this up like an advertisement, its not meant to be.
but if you are intrested in asking about it, i would say a PM is the best way, if thats ok with the site owners/admins.
thanks guys! enjoy!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687263 - 02/11/09 04:22 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: denmah]
|
1_Man_Army
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/21/08
Posts: 3166
Loc: (260) Indiana, US
|
Amazing!! How much was the Total cost of this project?
_________________________
2001 Ford CVPI w/ 2005 4.6L 2v, 31k miles  ~Pioneer Stereo, ~3.27w/t~loc(x5),~Bridgestone Potenza's[4],~New set of 8 C.O.P's(DG508),~New headlights,~ Sharkless Plenum, ~1/2' Intake Plenum Spacer,~75mm TB & Comb spacer, ~Thrush 2.25' welded mufflers, ~Rear Cat Delete ~17' glasspacks ~15% tint all around. ~MM Maf (80mm),~BOC tune/tuner (93 octane), "TRUE" CAI ,Coming Soon: Rear shocks, 3.73 r & trak lok rebuild kit, SW Long Tubes (ADTR) Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.-Dwight Eisenhower
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687266 - 02/11/09 04:26 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 1_Man_Army]
|
denmah
Stranger
Registered: 02/11/09
Posts: 5
Loc: allentown PA
|
im not sure yet, as they are still working out some things.
he wanted to try it out on the cheap initially and see how he liked it, at least thats what i perceived. but you need a decent mass air meter and injectors right away, and pretty much a pump at this point because the turbo actually makes alot more power than we had thought.
i can see when its done, they should be putting on the other exhaust housing and doing another tune later this week, i can update you guys and see if frank can give me a ballpark price for completed kit.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687269 - 02/11/09 04:29 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: denmah]
|
denmah
Stranger
Registered: 02/11/09
Posts: 5
Loc: allentown PA
|
oh yes, and there are all 4 cats (2 on each side) still intact
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687358 - 02/11/09 06:06 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: CodenameVIC]
|
04RauderDTR
Over the Hill
Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 4589
Loc: NEPA/Central NJ
|
are there vids of this car on youtube or something... seems fimalar.
Edit: doh, thats the vid i saw...
BTW, NJ, nice
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687366 - 02/11/09 06:15 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 04RauderDTR]
|
denmah
Stranger
Registered: 02/11/09
Posts: 5
Loc: allentown PA
|
yes, new jersey owned
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687375 - 02/11/09 06:30 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: denmah]
|
1_Man_Army
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/21/08
Posts: 3166
Loc: (260) Indiana, US
|
I like how the Turbo is concealed in the one pic. I would only reroute the BOV back into the exhaust pipe.
_________________________
2001 Ford CVPI w/ 2005 4.6L 2v, 31k miles  ~Pioneer Stereo, ~3.27w/t~loc(x5),~Bridgestone Potenza's[4],~New set of 8 C.O.P's(DG508),~New headlights,~ Sharkless Plenum, ~1/2' Intake Plenum Spacer,~75mm TB & Comb spacer, ~Thrush 2.25' welded mufflers, ~Rear Cat Delete ~17' glasspacks ~15% tint all around. ~MM Maf (80mm),~BOC tune/tuner (93 octane), "TRUE" CAI ,Coming Soon: Rear shocks, 3.73 r & trak lok rebuild kit, SW Long Tubes (ADTR) Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.-Dwight Eisenhower
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687608 - 02/11/09 10:15 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 1_Man_Army]
|
panther service advisor
Climber
Registered: 01/11/04
Posts: 673
Loc: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
|
This is an excellent alternative, because a well tuned turbo system is this best power adder. Is this a STS Turbo kit or is it his own design? If he gets this kit dialed in, easily reproduced it and support it. It would be a nice addition to our options when it comes to force induction. I only see a couple of things that I would change and add to this set up.
1. Heat shield for the floor pan. 2. Install a shroud connecting the front bumper to the lower radiator support to direct more air into the intercooler and radiator. 3. Use steel braided lines on the oil supply lines for the turbo. 4. Have the blow off valve vent back into the exhaust. 5. Add an Accusump to guard against low oil pressure to protect the turbo.
But I must say, well down and please have your friend continue the good work. Please keep us posted.
_________________________
03 CV Sport with Scan Gauge II, 21 mm rear sway bar, 02B02 fuel tank shield, awaiting tune from http://www.blueovalchips.com for my MM mas and 04 CVPI ziptube that is sitting in my garage. 96 CV LX with every option including memory seat and air suspension, except HPP. mods:98+ front brakes, 98-02 CVPI wheels, CVPI front springs, anti-sway bars, 02B02 fuel tank shield, CVPI TC and flywheel and CVPI PCM. (sold) 99 Dodge Dakota R/T 5.9 Club Cab 1 of 1100
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687625 - 02/11/09 10:25 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: panther service advisor]
|
1_Man_Army
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/21/08
Posts: 3166
Loc: (260) Indiana, US
|
PSA You are a very picky individual! Just kidding. I guess i would change those things as well, but the rerouting would be first. Blowing off into the atmosphere sounds like crap.
_________________________
2001 Ford CVPI w/ 2005 4.6L 2v, 31k miles  ~Pioneer Stereo, ~3.27w/t~loc(x5),~Bridgestone Potenza's[4],~New set of 8 C.O.P's(DG508),~New headlights,~ Sharkless Plenum, ~1/2' Intake Plenum Spacer,~75mm TB & Comb spacer, ~Thrush 2.25' welded mufflers, ~Rear Cat Delete ~17' glasspacks ~15% tint all around. ~MM Maf (80mm),~BOC tune/tuner (93 octane), "TRUE" CAI ,Coming Soon: Rear shocks, 3.73 r & trak lok rebuild kit, SW Long Tubes (ADTR) Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.-Dwight Eisenhower
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687657 - 02/11/09 10:47 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 1_Man_Army]
|
panther service advisor
Climber
Registered: 01/11/04
Posts: 673
Loc: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
|
I have always been picky, I use to drive my technicians crazy. But, later on they all thanked me because we all shared in bonus checks when we didn't have come-backs. This turbo kit shows great promise, they just need to send me one for hot weather testing.
_________________________
03 CV Sport with Scan Gauge II, 21 mm rear sway bar, 02B02 fuel tank shield, awaiting tune from http://www.blueovalchips.com for my MM mas and 04 CVPI ziptube that is sitting in my garage. 96 CV LX with every option including memory seat and air suspension, except HPP. mods:98+ front brakes, 98-02 CVPI wheels, CVPI front springs, anti-sway bars, 02B02 fuel tank shield, CVPI TC and flywheel and CVPI PCM. (sold) 99 Dodge Dakota R/T 5.9 Club Cab 1 of 1100
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687676 - 02/11/09 11:00 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Dan The Vic Man]
|
1_Man_Army
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/21/08
Posts: 3166
Loc: (260) Indiana, US
|
You could y pipe the single back into a dual exhaust if you wanted. I would probably add some resonators as well.
_________________________
2001 Ford CVPI w/ 2005 4.6L 2v, 31k miles  ~Pioneer Stereo, ~3.27w/t~loc(x5),~Bridgestone Potenza's[4],~New set of 8 C.O.P's(DG508),~New headlights,~ Sharkless Plenum, ~1/2' Intake Plenum Spacer,~75mm TB & Comb spacer, ~Thrush 2.25' welded mufflers, ~Rear Cat Delete ~17' glasspacks ~15% tint all around. ~MM Maf (80mm),~BOC tune/tuner (93 octane), "TRUE" CAI ,Coming Soon: Rear shocks, 3.73 r & trak lok rebuild kit, SW Long Tubes (ADTR) Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.-Dwight Eisenhower
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687681 - 02/11/09 11:03 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 1_Man_Army]
|
Dan The Vic Man
I broke it
Poobah
Registered: 11/22/03
Posts: 9011
Loc: Coon Rapids MN
|
You could y pipe the single back into a dual exhaust if you wanted. I would probably add some resonators as well. I take it thats how the exhuast also goes from dual into one pipe into the turbo also huh. I would love to have a rear mount turbo and am pretty much stock with that option only because im not getting rid of my custom long tubes i just had made.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1687951 - 02/12/09 09:26 AM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Dan The Vic Man]
|
AM_Dann
Rookie
Registered: 01/01/09
Posts: 53
Loc: Downingtown, PA
|
Hey man, just sayin hi! Didn't know you were on here. This is 240sxdann from TST. I said it before, I'll say it again, awesome project.
_________________________
 AmericanMuscle.com 1997 Crown Victoria LX 4.10's, SCT Tuned, and ghetto exhaust
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688124 - 02/12/09 12:54 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: AM_Dann]
|
BlownMerc
Member
Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 302
Loc: Carrsville, VA
|
Does look nice. For dual exhaust, you could run twin turbos Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but a BOV is on the intake side, to vent boost on closed throttle back to the intake side of the compressor. A waste gate is on the exhaust side. But I do agree, I would want it routed to the exhaust outlet. But I guess the fabrication would be a little more involved.
_________________________
 98 Mercury GM--forged internals, PI heads, Allen Supercharger M90 355rwhp/430rwtq 12.87 @ 104.8  PI 3000 2000 F250 7.3L TDI oil burner 2008 Taurus X
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688155 - 02/12/09 01:36 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: BlownMerc]
|
bjorkmae
Over the Hill
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 1625
Loc: Troutdale, OR
|
Having actually installed turbos the blow off valve is designed for the extra air pumped into the charge pipes because the turbo has built up boost and the throttle had closed. The blow off valve vents the extra pressurized air to atmosphere so its easier on the turbo bearings and so that the turbo doesn't get slowed down as much by the pressurized air. That way it spins up more quickly when the gas pedal is pressed for the next gear. Venting the blow off valve to the exhaust is CRAZY. Now as far as sound I prefer venting the blow off valve to atmosphere directly and not into the intake tube. Also if you have a big enough turbo, venting the blow off valve into the intake tube before the turbo can cause tuning problems because it can actually blow air back out of the intake filter fooling the MAF and causing driveability problems. Been there done that. Waste gates bleed off extra exhaust gases so that the turbo doesn't produce too much boost, adjusting at what PSI the waste gate opens is how do set the boost that the turbo will produce. Venting the waste gate to atmosphere sounds like ass and I prefer that to be blown back into the exhaust after the turbo. Also an FYI a blow off valve is the name for valves that blow extra compressed air from the turbo to atmosphere and not into the intake tube before the turbo. A bypass valve is the same as a blow off valve except it blows the air back into the intake tube before the turbo.
_________________________
SOLD: for $4400 I will miss it  SUPERCHARGED 1998 CVPI with 2001 5.4 PI swap, V2 S-trim Vortech @ 8PSI, 2.5" duals with X-pipe, Magnaflow mufflers and down pipes, ported TB & plenum, PI intake manifold, 2000 10k miles trans w/J-mod, AEM FPR w/gauge, 55lb low impedance injectors, LC-1 Wide band O2, XCal2 w/Pro-Racer software, KYB gas-adjusts, new upper & lower ball joints, new inner & outer tie rods, new steering box and pitman arm, rebuilt rear end w/locker, new alternator and starter, Sealed dry cell battery in the trunk, new external high performance fuel pump, 17" 06 GT wheels with 245/45/17 Blizzaks, Rear Fascia Tuck, tinted windows, new rear brakes, Sony Cd w/remote and HD radio, Marquis power seats, spot light. http://s412.photobucket.com/albums/pp202/bjorkmae/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688165 - 02/12/09 01:47 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: bjorkmae]
|
JeffBoudah
Poobah
Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 5315
Loc: Holland,MI
|
Also if you have a big enough turbo, venting the blow off valve into the intake tube before the turbo can cause tuning problems because it can actually blow air back out of the intake filter fooling the MAF and causing driveability problems. Been there done that.
were you be running a BOV with a draw threw MAF? the compressed air being released to the atmosphere has been meetered already, no wonder you had tuning issues.
BOV before a blow-threw MAF... is the correct way to run a turbo setup.
_________________________
1985 Crown Victoria 2-door 2003 Explorer XLT 81k miles, bone stock and staying that way... maybe 1990 Grand Marquis LS, In the junk yard, RIP!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688219 - 02/12/09 03:02 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: JeffBoudah]
|
1_Man_Army
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/21/08
Posts: 3166
Loc: (260) Indiana, US
|
Yea, that what i meant, the waste gate. not the blow off valve. sorry for the confusion
_________________________
2001 Ford CVPI w/ 2005 4.6L 2v, 31k miles  ~Pioneer Stereo, ~3.27w/t~loc(x5),~Bridgestone Potenza's[4],~New set of 8 C.O.P's(DG508),~New headlights,~ Sharkless Plenum, ~1/2' Intake Plenum Spacer,~75mm TB & Comb spacer, ~Thrush 2.25' welded mufflers, ~Rear Cat Delete ~17' glasspacks ~15% tint all around. ~MM Maf (80mm),~BOC tune/tuner (93 octane), "TRUE" CAI ,Coming Soon: Rear shocks, 3.73 r & trak lok rebuild kit, SW Long Tubes (ADTR) Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.-Dwight Eisenhower
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688247 - 02/12/09 03:35 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 1_Man_Army]
|
interceptor09
Over the Hill
Registered: 06/16/08
Posts: 2651
Loc: Just this side of Hell
|
Sweet car, saw the video on youtube a couple weeks ago.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688317 - 02/12/09 05:00 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: interceptor09]
|
P71CVMAN
Over the Hill
Registered: 07/09/07
Posts: 3059
Loc: Beaver Dam, WI
|
FWIW: I ran my TA-49 turbo without a BOV for 4 years on my old GN without any problems. Almost all of the GN guys don't run a BOV(at least when I last owned my car). The sounds of the turbo "sneezing" back into the atmosphere through the MAF/cone filter would scare everyone.  This is definatly a cool project! Reminds me of the LS1/LS2 guys I see around here with rear mounted turbos.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1688417 - 02/12/09 07:06 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: JeffBoudah]
|
bjorkmae
Over the Hill
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 1625
Loc: Troutdale, OR
|
Also if you have a big enough turbo, venting the blow off valve into the intake tube before the turbo can cause tuning problems because it can actually blow air back out of the intake filter fooling the MAF and causing driveability problems. Been there done that. were you be running a BOV with a draw threw MAF? the compressed air being released to the atmosphere has been meetered already, no wonder you had tuning issues. BOV before a blow-threw MAF... is the correct way to run a turbo setup. No I am not that dumb, I have done too many boosted projects to screw up that badly If you read my posts you would understand what the problem was, but there are too many of them to expect that kind of home work. OK so originally I ran the by pass valve just like the vortech setup up was intended on the mustang. THe intake stream went this way: Cone filter, MAF, bypass valve return, breather tube, supercharger, charge pipe, by pass valve exit, idle control motor, then throttle body. The way I had it set up originally the MAF did measure all of the air going into the engine and the by pass return occurred between the MAF and the supercharger input. This is exactly how the vortech was intended on the mustang. Unfortunately what happens is that the extra air produced by the supercharger that is released when you let off the gas is let off through the by pass valve and if there is too much air it will actually blow dirt off of the cone filter. Of course in the process the air excess air blows past the MAF. This is enough of an issue that there is actually adjustments in the pro racer software specifically made to remedy that by using the failed maf table when this occurs. Now the way I have the intake system is in this order: cone filter, breather tube, supercharger, charger tube, by pass valve exit, MAF, idle control motor, throttle body. That way any extra compressed air gets vented to atmosphere and can't blow backwards across the MAF. Doing it this way avoids having to reference the failed maf table during blow off and this of course makes the programming much easier and makes the datalogging easier to interpret since there aren't crazy MAF readings when you let off the gas.
_________________________
SOLD: for $4400 I will miss it  SUPERCHARGED 1998 CVPI with 2001 5.4 PI swap, V2 S-trim Vortech @ 8PSI, 2.5" duals with X-pipe, Magnaflow mufflers and down pipes, ported TB & plenum, PI intake manifold, 2000 10k miles trans w/J-mod, AEM FPR w/gauge, 55lb low impedance injectors, LC-1 Wide band O2, XCal2 w/Pro-Racer software, KYB gas-adjusts, new upper & lower ball joints, new inner & outer tie rods, new steering box and pitman arm, rebuilt rear end w/locker, new alternator and starter, Sealed dry cell battery in the trunk, new external high performance fuel pump, 17" 06 GT wheels with 245/45/17 Blizzaks, Rear Fascia Tuck, tinted windows, new rear brakes, Sony Cd w/remote and HD radio, Marquis power seats, spot light. http://s412.photobucket.com/albums/pp202/bjorkmae/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1696537 - 02/23/09 10:37 AM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 9psicvpi]
|
STPchild
n00b
Registered: 01/26/09
Posts: 16
Loc: Boston, MA
|
Did he run that # on the stock injectors, or with 42's? I am confused.
Also tell your bud, great car. Comming from the mustang world, and now with the Vic. I already have the itch, and this is right up my alley. So tired of the normal, Vortech, Paxton, Kenne Bell, Whipple crowd.
Had alot of ecxperience building my mustang, so I dont think this would be such a big deal. LOW BUCK STYLE
Did pete build and tune the kit? I have a few questions before I start mine...
_________________________
2001 White CVPI
JMOD, MAGNAFLOWS
GONE BUT NOT FORGOTEN 1999 GT Blown, Cammed, Cooled, 518rwhp 468rwtq
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1696548 - 02/23/09 10:47 AM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: STPchild]
|
JeffBoudah
Poobah
Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 5315
Loc: Holland,MI
|
So tired of the normal, Vortech, Paxton, Kenne Bell, Whipple crowd.
Well you're in luck... cuz we have none of those around here. lol
_________________________
1985 Crown Victoria 2-door 2003 Explorer XLT 81k miles, bone stock and staying that way... maybe 1990 Grand Marquis LS, In the junk yard, RIP!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1696659 - 02/23/09 01:06 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Big_Bad_Joe]
|
Dan The Vic Man
I broke it
Poobah
Registered: 11/22/03
Posts: 9011
Loc: Coon Rapids MN
|
Hey Dan
Your car is pretty nice right now all NA and you have done a nice job on the overall package you have...
I would go with an S/C like Drock (or a radical procharger if you wanted to get stupid on us...)... Drock's set up would look very nice under the hood and scoot to boot...
I just think that would be a very nice DD with a ton of guts.... lots of low end...
Thanks bud! The hp bug got to me lol.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1696719 - 02/23/09 02:09 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: JeffBoudah]
|
bjorkmae
Over the Hill
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 1625
Loc: Troutdale, OR
|
So tired of the normal, Vortech, Paxton, Kenne Bell, Whipple crowd.
Well you're in luck... cuz we have none of those around here. lol We don't?? Where have you been? Drock's car is a roots style like those mentioned above and mine is a vortech.
_________________________
SOLD: for $4400 I will miss it  SUPERCHARGED 1998 CVPI with 2001 5.4 PI swap, V2 S-trim Vortech @ 8PSI, 2.5" duals with X-pipe, Magnaflow mufflers and down pipes, ported TB & plenum, PI intake manifold, 2000 10k miles trans w/J-mod, AEM FPR w/gauge, 55lb low impedance injectors, LC-1 Wide band O2, XCal2 w/Pro-Racer software, KYB gas-adjusts, new upper & lower ball joints, new inner & outer tie rods, new steering box and pitman arm, rebuilt rear end w/locker, new alternator and starter, Sealed dry cell battery in the trunk, new external high performance fuel pump, 17" 06 GT wheels with 245/45/17 Blizzaks, Rear Fascia Tuck, tinted windows, new rear brakes, Sony Cd w/remote and HD radio, Marquis power seats, spot light. http://s412.photobucket.com/albums/pp202/bjorkmae/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1696735 - 02/23/09 02:26 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: bjorkmae]
|
JeffBoudah
Poobah
Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 5315
Loc: Holland,MI
|
So tired of the normal, Vortech, Paxton, Kenne Bell, Whipple crowd.
Well you're in luck... cuz we have none of those around here. lol We don't?? Where have you been? Drock's car is a roots style like those mentioned above and mine is a vortech.
I was being facetious...
_________________________
1985 Crown Victoria 2-door 2003 Explorer XLT 81k miles, bone stock and staying that way... maybe 1990 Grand Marquis LS, In the junk yard, RIP!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1696757 - 02/23/09 02:46 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: JeffBoudah]
|
bjorkmae
Over the Hill
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 1625
Loc: Troutdale, OR
|
Yeah I wondered. Seamed kinda odd for you.
_________________________
SOLD: for $4400 I will miss it  SUPERCHARGED 1998 CVPI with 2001 5.4 PI swap, V2 S-trim Vortech @ 8PSI, 2.5" duals with X-pipe, Magnaflow mufflers and down pipes, ported TB & plenum, PI intake manifold, 2000 10k miles trans w/J-mod, AEM FPR w/gauge, 55lb low impedance injectors, LC-1 Wide band O2, XCal2 w/Pro-Racer software, KYB gas-adjusts, new upper & lower ball joints, new inner & outer tie rods, new steering box and pitman arm, rebuilt rear end w/locker, new alternator and starter, Sealed dry cell battery in the trunk, new external high performance fuel pump, 17" 06 GT wheels with 245/45/17 Blizzaks, Rear Fascia Tuck, tinted windows, new rear brakes, Sony Cd w/remote and HD radio, Marquis power seats, spot light. http://s412.photobucket.com/albums/pp202/bjorkmae/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1697048 - 02/23/09 08:15 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: bjorkmae]
|
MrEvil
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/06/07
Posts: 1586
Loc: Austin TX
|
Very nice results on that turbo. I've been skeptical about plumbing a turbo that far towards the rear, but it appears that that doesn't cause any problems. Also interesting to see that the cats have little effect on the turbo's performance.
I'd like some turbocharged goodness on my car, but I would like to try a custom shorty header setup with the turbo tucked up in the corner of the engine bay. At least in a bit easier to access spot than on my F250.
I'm not crazy about the BOV sneezing either, makes me glad my F250's Diesel doesn't need one.
_________________________
 1998 Ford CVPI formerly an unmarked for the Potter County TX Sheriff's department 2000 Ford F250 Superduty 4x4 Diesel 1992 Ford Explorer 4x4 1966 Ford Thunderbird 1961 Ford F100
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1697115 - 02/23/09 09:42 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: MrEvil]
|
P71Hype
Member
Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 173
Loc: baltimore,md
|
i was think about the turbo thing then i got a price 6-7k so i cried in the car
_________________________
99 Crown Victoria Interceptor Constantly under constuction 4.6 3v Coming Soon(Sometime Before the fall)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1697171 - 02/23/09 10:40 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: P71Hype]
|
Dan The Vic Man
I broke it
Poobah
Registered: 11/22/03
Posts: 9011
Loc: Coon Rapids MN
|
i was think about the turbo thing then i got a price 6-7k so i cried in the car Where was the quote from? Was it from the place that did the rear mount on the vic above?
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1697320 - 02/24/09 03:44 AM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Dan The Vic Man]
|
P71Hype
Member
Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 173
Loc: baltimore,md
|
i was think about the turbo thing then i got a price 6-7k so i cried in the car Where was the quote from? Was it from the place that did the rear mount on the vic above? no this was from a local shop. Come to think about it thats really not that bad for a custom setup. I still die a litte more everytime i drive buy
_________________________
99 Crown Victoria Interceptor Constantly under constuction 4.6 3v Coming Soon(Sometime Before the fall)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1697733 - 02/24/09 06:09 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Big_Bad_Joe]
|
9psicvpi
Over the Hill
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 1411
Loc: Orlando FL
|
there is no way you should fork out 6-7K ona 1999 car for a mild turbo
I mean thats a nice install.. don't get me wrong.. but that would kind of silly to me... non-intercooled and mounted the way it is... half that price would be fair.. out of pocket with some modest skills you should be able to do it for 2-3K depending on how much you score the hair dryer for
yea dude thats a bit much slickvic03 did his 4 about 3k and his had n intercooler
_________________________
 "Chuck Norris built my stock longblock. It runs on the tears of small children and makes 10,000 hp. He said it's his 'street version' "
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1697850 - 02/24/09 08:14 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Big_Bad_Joe]
|
P71Hype
Member
Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 173
Loc: baltimore,md
|
there is no way you should fork out 6-7K ona 1999 car for a mild turbo
I mean thats a nice install.. don't get me wrong.. but that would kind of silly to me... non-intercooled and mounted the way it is... half that price would be fair.. out of pocket with some modest skills you should be able to do it for 2-3K depending on how much you score the hair dryer for
The qoute wasn't for a remote mount system. It was for a header. Mount and intercooled mid size turbo system
_________________________
99 Crown Victoria Interceptor Constantly under constuction 4.6 3v Coming Soon(Sometime Before the fall)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1741811 - 04/12/09 09:33 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: P71Hype]
|
FrankBehill
n00b
Registered: 03/14/09
Posts: 46
Loc: PA
|
Thanks for posting. Where are they getting the oil pressure off the block? What kind of pump is used to pump it back to the motor from the turbo? Ive got the yellow turbo 454 Nova over on TTF, Im here in PA too. Thanks for any info you have on oiling.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742316 - 04/13/09 04:02 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: FrankBehill]
|
humphrey
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/09
Posts: 3
Loc: nc
|
theres a guy in n.c. selling front mount 70mm turbo kits for 2003 up crowns
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742325 - 04/13/09 04:18 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: humphrey]
|
JeffBoudah
Poobah
Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 5315
Loc: Holland,MI
|
Reference?
_________________________
1985 Crown Victoria 2-door 2003 Explorer XLT 81k miles, bone stock and staying that way... maybe 1990 Grand Marquis LS, In the junk yard, RIP!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742440 - 04/13/09 07:23 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: JeffBoudah]
|
humphrey
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/09
Posts: 3
Loc: nc
|
complete bolt on kit i thank its around 5k i've heard its a bad a$$ kit 70mm turbo,50mm wastgate,31x12x3 intercooler 3" intercooler piping
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742479 - 04/13/09 08:08 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: humphrey]
|
FrankBehill
n00b
Registered: 03/14/09
Posts: 46
Loc: PA
|
You could build your own rear mount for under $2k probably but there is quite a bit of work involved probably. A turbo would be $600, wastegate $300, hotside and coldside tubing around $300, wideband gauge $250, oil lines around $300 and who knows for a return pump, Im not sure what would be used for this. You wouldnt need a blow off valve for the pressure you could run on stock rods and pistons. Better injectors and fuel pump would add to the cost but maybe the stock stuff could keep up for low pressure like 5 psi?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742575 - 04/13/09 09:42 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: FrankBehill]
|
humphrey
Stranger
Registered: 03/26/09
Posts: 3
Loc: nc
|
You can run up to 10 psi on a stock bottom end and rear mounts are for people that wont a little over stock (not saying they dont make power)with this kit u can run low pressure then build ur motor and have a fast car.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742604 - 04/13/09 10:08 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: humphrey]
|
P71Hype
Member
Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 173
Loc: baltimore,md
|
I just want a turbo granny wagon and to shock the hell out of hondas
_________________________
99 Crown Victoria Interceptor Constantly under constuction 4.6 3v Coming Soon(Sometime Before the fall)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1742616 - 04/13/09 10:23 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: humphrey]
|
FrankBehill
n00b
Registered: 03/14/09
Posts: 46
Loc: PA
|
You can run up to 10 psi on a stock bottom end and rear mounts are for people that wont a little over stock (not saying they dont make power)with this kit u can run low pressure then build ur motor and have a fast car.
You could build a front mount for around $2k as well with a turbo that will make 1000hp. I just did it on a big block Chevy including blow through carb and hat. The money gets big when you build your shortblock and fuel system.
Edited by FrankBehill (04/13/09 10:24 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1743091 - 04/14/09 12:49 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: humphrey]
|
JeffBoudah
Poobah
Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 5315
Loc: Holland,MI
|
You can run up to 10 psi on a stock bottom end and rear mounts are for people that wont a little over stock (not saying they dont make power)with this kit u can run low pressure then build ur motor and have a fast car.
ha, whatever
There is a slight loss in efficiency due to the lower EGT and a little loss of exhaust velocity. But you solve this problem by using a smaller exhaust housing A/R than you would a front mount.
Please explain how a boost level achieved with a remote mount is going to produce significantly less power than a similar sized turbo producing the same boost level under the hood? Besides a minuscule amount of extra lag, what's the difference?
_________________________
1985 Crown Victoria 2-door 2003 Explorer XLT 81k miles, bone stock and staying that way... maybe 1990 Grand Marquis LS, In the junk yard, RIP!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1743197 - 04/14/09 03:02 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: FrankBehill]
|
Robb4248
n00b
Registered: 08/19/08
Posts: 31
Loc: Harrisburg, PA
|
Someone said it earlier... boost is boost. And this is very true. Regardless, this setup will have a bit of lag, but you're not loosing that much power, yes, it takes a bit more to travel, and just like electrical work, after a certain distance, there will be a slight loss, all depending on the distance that the boost travels.
Think of it this way, we have two garrett t04's:
46mm compressor wheel, producing 564cfm at full spool 60mm compressor wheel, producing 650cfm at full spool
Now the 60mm compressor wheel is producing more flow, reducing lag and power loss. The faster air flows, the less lag will be produced. So we're having to push air, let's say... through roughly 8 feet of housing, which will do it faster? The larger turbo. From what I understand, the lag is not that noticeable.
Since this setup eliminates an intercooler, the air doesn't get denser, thus requires a lower PSI to actually run the system. Another awesome perk: less bends = less PSI required. This all depends on how it's setup again, however, theoretically it will require less boost to be generated than a conventional under-the-hood setup.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1743200 - 04/14/09 03:10 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: Robb4248]
|
FrankBehill
n00b
Registered: 03/14/09
Posts: 46
Loc: PA
|
ANY turbo setup is good, doesnt matter how ugly or where its mounted. I built the ugliest turbo kit on the planet, but 15psi on a 454 it really scoots, doesnt matter what it looks like
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1743213 - 04/14/09 03:34 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 9psicvpi]
|
1_Man_Army
Over the Hill
Registered: 10/21/08
Posts: 3166
Loc: (260) Indiana, US
|
I bet there was next to no lag in that setup. I'd like to do that to a 5.4L
_________________________
2001 Ford CVPI w/ 2005 4.6L 2v, 31k miles  ~Pioneer Stereo, ~3.27w/t~loc(x5),~Bridgestone Potenza's[4],~New set of 8 C.O.P's(DG508),~New headlights,~ Sharkless Plenum, ~1/2' Intake Plenum Spacer,~75mm TB & Comb spacer, ~Thrush 2.25' welded mufflers, ~Rear Cat Delete ~17' glasspacks ~15% tint all around. ~MM Maf (80mm),~BOC tune/tuner (93 octane), "TRUE" CAI ,Coming Soon: Rear shocks, 3.73 r & trak lok rebuild kit, SW Long Tubes (ADTR) Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.-Dwight Eisenhower
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1747588 - 04/19/09 02:19 PM
Re: Turbo Interceptor project
[Re: 1_Man_Army]
|
Black_Cat
Rookie
Registered: 03/05/08
Posts: 61
Loc: Toledo, Ohio
|
I am sereously thinking about doing something similair. I have a Holset WH2D from a previous project and was wondering if anyone could tell me if this was to big for a 281C.I. mod motor
_________________________
" I don't have a ego, I just love how awesome I am"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: JohnG, dRock96Marquis, Liquid
|
The Tire Decision Guide
|
|
|