Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! registry | CVN on Facebook | tech | news | email login Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!


Welcome to CVN - Your Panther platform headquarters!


Custom Search


Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#2287887 - 04/29/11 10:17 PM 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150
imprtslyer Offline
Stranger

Registered: 04/28/11
Posts: 3
Loc: Ny
Hey Guys I need some help with this one. I got a 4.6 2v out of a 2007 police car a few months ago FOR FREE along with some other necessary items like automatic trans, computer, radiator and some other little things. I am going to put this into my 1978 f150 because well its just sits around and i need a driver that i can take to college and not worry to much about paint and so on. I'm hoping the 4.6 provides me with much better mpg than the oh 5 i get now out of my tired 360. I was searching the internet and saw a guy that took the whole front end out oh a crown vic and used it in his 78 f150. Which is awesome, makes mounting the engine easy provides me with modern suspension, maybe abs ect. having this suspension also puts me into the car wheel market granting me access to my favorite wheels thus another plus to the swap.... myproblem is the police gave me the run around and ended up dumping the 2007 and 2009 PIs into the junk yard -_- so needless to say im pissed and now i actually have to buy the parts i had dibs on back :/ well since it went to the junkyard the rack and pinion are out along with the tie-rods and rotors. So i priced these parts up to find what i would have to have to get it to work and its like 600 bucks for rack an pinion, rotors, pads, tie rods ect. well if i am going to spend the money i want to spend the money wisely. So I would like to know what are my options as far as aftermarket goes. Are there better pieces for cheaper or relatively the same price? Obviously I want to get as most performance out of it for as little as possible (who doesnt). I will gladly take any advice you have to offer. it doesnt even have to be limited to the front end.

Top
Links
#2288050 - 04/30/11 10:32 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
2004_p71 Offline

no replacement for displacement
Posting Addict

Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 16129
Loc: Quebec Canada
hi and welcome to cvn

Sorry to tell you that and I absolutly dont want to be rude at all but if you want to spend your money wisely just forget abouth this swap and heres why....

-trying to get good mileage out of a 4.6 swapped in a 78 heavy pick up just dosent belong in the same sentence heck mileage and pickup truck.

-the 4.6 281 is a small v8 engine that is not configured to provide the low end torque you need to moove an heavy chassis like your pick up.You would need to at least get a truck intake and even though I'm not even sure if it would be enought to moove decently this truck.

-As you mentioned You want as much performance out of it for as little as possible...that is just not possible without power adder on that 4.6.

- I would highly consider many option before attempting such a swap cause that project is a money pit even if you get the motor for free
_________________________

Best time 13.079 @ 105 1.8 60'
Hunting for flat 12's in 2023 !

Top
#2288330 - 04/30/11 09:16 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
thevat26 Offline
n00b

Registered: 04/28/11
Posts: 24
Loc: So Cal
I agree with 2004 p71. Too many things need to be changed to be cost effective.
_________________________
2005 P71. 126xxx miles. Purchased 03-11.

Top
#2288393 - 04/30/11 11:39 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
gDMJoe Offline


Poobah

Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 7781
Loc: Timbuk3, MI
Posted in the wrong forum is oh so many ways ...
  • this is 1992 - Up: Aeros & Whales » Steering, Suspension and Brakes
  • other than the engine, it's not Panther platform related. *More appropriate for an F-150 web site ( www.f150online.com | www.f150forum.com ).

Lounge »
- Forums for general discussion.
    _________________________

    -click the Vic-

    Top
    #2288482 - 05/01/11 03:58 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    BlaineB Offline
    Over the Hill

    Registered: 09/21/06
    Posts: 4379
    Loc: Indiana
    If he gears the rear end right, it sounds like it would be a fun swap.

    Top
    #2288514 - 05/01/11 08:52 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    imprtslyer Offline
    Stranger

    Registered: 04/28/11
    Posts: 3
    Loc: Ny
    Thanks for your replies but i don't think you understood the reason for my post. My intention was to ask you crown vic guys for some advice on after market parts for the suspension and brakes for my truck. forget the fact its going in a truck, what are some good upgrades for a crown vic suspension or brakes. @gDMJoe this is why i posted in the "Steering, Suspension and Brakes" section. I need information on those components. @2004_p71 "the 4.6 281 is a small v8 engine that is not configured to provide the low end torque you need to moove an heavy chassis like your pick up.You would need to at least get a truck intake and even though I'm not even sure if it would be enought to moove decently this truck." I disagree with this statement and here is why. A crown vic police interceptor weight about 5000 pounds with all the equipment in the car. My truck as a lifted 4x4 f250 with a 360, 33" tires,and steel wheels weighed in at about 5200 on a scale when i took it to the dump. so with a 4.6 (which weights less than a 360) i should save weight there. I should also save weight when i replace the front with a aluminum cross member and independent suspension, removing the transfer-case and replacing the rear end with the crown vic 4 link set up. this should put me under 5000 lbs knowing that my transfer case weighs atleast 200 lbs. Not to mention no front drive shaft and i'll be using the crown vics aluminum rear driveshaft. So its going to be moving a lighter vehicle.

    Top
    #2288568 - 05/01/11 11:00 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    TheDriver959 Offline
    Climber

    Registered: 07/30/08
    Posts: 644
    Loc: Oshawa, ON
    You don't seem to understand. The 4.6L SOHC 2V V8 is BARELY adequate for the 5000lbs Lincoln Town Car Signature L. The CVPI DOES NOT weigh an additional 1000lbs when loaded with equipment. To boot, the 2V uses a cast iron block, which makes it heavy.

    Truthfully, if you're looking for fuel economy, you're stepping over dollars for dimes here. Sell the stuff for profit, and sell the truck. Buy yourself an economical car. Because odds are, it would cost you more to convert the truck to use the CVPI drive train than you'd ever see in fuel economy savings. In the Town Car, the 4.6L gets about 16mpg on the highway, and the only reason it does that well is because the body is rounded. In a 1978 F-Series truck, it wouldn't do any better than whatever was in it because those trucks are like throwing bricks through the air.
    _________________________
    2004 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor
    LX Sport Console & Floor Shifter, Gentex Electrochromic Mirror w/compass, Marauder Cluster, Speed Control w/leather wheel, LED turn signals, HID headlights (projectors coming), EATC (DIY, in progress), Marauder corners, Rewired DRL, Rewired turn signals, Maraudered headlights, Grille Mounted Driving Lights, Bullitt Wheels, Pirelli Tires and a Custom Ram Air System. More to come!

    Top
    #2288589 - 05/01/11 11:32 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    gDMJoe Offline


    Poobah

    Registered: 06/03/03
    Posts: 7781
    Loc: Timbuk3, MI
    Quote:
    imprtslyer ...@gDMJoe this is why i posted in the "Steering, Suspension and Brakes" section. I need information on those components.

    You can put whatever spin you want on your post(s), but it's still in the wrong forum ... The heart of the matter is a F-150 and swapping parts to it.


    Lounge »
    - Forums for general discussion.

    Top
    #2288606 - 05/01/11 11:53 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: TheDriver959]
    2004_p71 Offline

    no replacement for displacement
    Posting Addict

    Registered: 09/04/03
    Posts: 16129
    Loc: Quebec Canada
    Originally Posted By: TheDriver959
    You don't seem to understand. The 4.6L SOHC 2V V8 is BARELY adequate for the 5000lbs Lincoln Town Car Signature L. The CVPI DOES NOT weigh an additional 1000lbs when loaded with equipment. To boot, the 2V uses a cast iron block, which makes it heavy.

    Truthfully, if you're looking for fuel economy, you're stepping over dollars for dimes here. Sell the stuff for profit, and sell the truck. Buy yourself an economical car. Because odds are, it would cost you more to convert the truck to use the CVPI drive train than you'd ever see in fuel economy savings. In the Town Car, the 4.6L gets about 16mpg on the highway, and the only reason it does that well is because the body is rounded. In a 1978 F-Series truck, it wouldn't do any better than whatever was in it because those trucks are like throwing bricks through the air.


    x2
    case closed
    _________________________

    Best time 13.079 @ 105 1.8 60'
    Hunting for flat 12's in 2023 !

    Top
    #2288934 - 05/01/11 09:38 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    imprtslyer Offline
    Stranger

    Registered: 04/28/11
    Posts: 3
    Loc: Ny
    Originally Posted By: gDMJoe
    You can put whatever spin you want on your post(s), but it's still in the wrong forum ... The heart of the matter is a F-150 and swapping parts to it.




    So what your saying is I should ask questions about the crown vic suspension in a f150 forum? ok that makes sense.

    Originally Posted By: 2004_p71
    Originally Posted By: TheDriver959
    You don't seem to understand. The 4.6L SOHC 2V V8 is BARELY adequate for the 5000lbs Lincoln Town Car Signature L. The CVPI DOES NOT weigh an additional 1000lbs when loaded with equipment. To boot, the 2V uses a cast iron block, which makes it heavy.

    Truthfully, if you're looking for fuel economy, you're stepping over dollars for dimes here. Sell the stuff for profit, and sell the truck. Buy yourself an economical car. Because odds are, it would cost you more to convert the truck to use the CVPI drive train than you'd ever see in fuel economy savings. In the Town Car, the 4.6L gets about 16mpg on the highway, and the only reason it does that well is because the body is rounded. In a 1978 F-Series truck, it wouldn't do any better than whatever was in it because those trucks are like throwing bricks through the air.


    x2
    case closed


    Ok i found the 5000lb number in one of your other threads on here. It is inconsistent to the 4158 I found this web site so i'll go with that. https://www.fleet.ford.com/downloads/brochures/2009/09PoliceIntercep_2.pdf

    However I found a f100 like what i am going to build weights about 3570. http://www.oldride.com/library/1974_ford_f100.html

    so for the sake of argument I am still in at less weight.

    now i have a total of 20 bucks invested in my truck to date. add 200 for the front suspension and im at 220. fuel pump, wheels tires, rack and pinion puts me under 3k. Wheels and tires make up for half of that. I understand its not going to get 30 mpg, but it will do better than the 5 it gets now. I have been to a few truck shows where people do the same swap im starting and they said they manage 17+ on the highway.

    5.4 liter make 365 lbft of toque according to http://streetspecs.com/specifications-for/2010-ford-f-150-lariat-supercrew-55-ft-bed-4x2

    the 4.6 i have makes 297 from the same link as the weight above. 68 is a lot to gain but I'm sure with some of the money i'll save i could manage that.

    I know its shaped like a brick but i never said i wanted civic type mileage. I just wanted an improvement on what I have now.

    and to the comment about the 4.6 liter being heavy i understand its cast and its heavy but in comparison to the 360 thats in it now its much lighter. the 360 weights 650lb http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_FE_engine
    the 4.6 weighs about 486
    http://forums.corral.net/forums/gt-sohc/994765-whats-weight-4-6-2v-engine.html

    thanks for your help

    Top
    #2289247 - 05/02/11 09:34 AM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    GrandMarq9807 Offline
    Over the Hill

    Registered: 05/10/10
    Posts: 4420
    Loc: Virginia
    You guys forget about the weight, a '78 weighs a lot less than the modern monsters, my '93 Lightning with a 351 weighs around 4500(was weighed just a week ago), and that's more than a '78... Also a stock carbed 360 is a dog, the 4.6 will come close to matching it's performance and get better mileage to boot... It's doubtful the 360 would get more than 15mpg on a good day, driving moderately the 4.6 & O/D trans should bust 20Mpg easily, a friend's '10 F150 regularly gets 21-22mpg on the highway...

    Now is this a swap I'd perform?? No not really, I ain't a 4.6 fan but again it was free... Still I feel it's wrong to discourage a potential swap because it isn't something I'd undertake..
    _________________________
    1998 Grand Marquis LS. 96K mi. .. Stock
    2007 Grand Marquis GS. 90K mi. .. Stock
    1996 F-150 XLT 196K mi Beater, Stock

    ----------My Toys---------(links are up)
    1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 4-Speed
    1972 Comet GT Restomod 306, C4
    1988 Turbo Coupe 331 AOD & 3.73 .. Pressurized ½ Motor is History

    *****************NEW TOY!!!*********************
    1969 Base Fairlane 302, C4, 45K mi(really!)

    Now with P/S & PDB
    Gonna wake it up with a Blue Print headed 347




    Top
    #2289408 - 05/02/11 12:46 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: 2004_p71]
    Chevyguy Offline

    Poobah

    Registered: 01/05/04
    Posts: 9450
    Loc: Winchester Mass
    Originally Posted By: 2004_p71
    Originally Posted By: TheDriver959
    You don't seem to understand. The 4.6L SOHC 2V V8 is BARELY adequate for the 5000lbs Lincoln Town Car Signature L. The CVPI DOES NOT weigh an additional 1000lbs when loaded with equipment. To boot, the 2V uses a cast iron block, which makes it heavy.

    Truthfully, if you're looking for fuel economy, you're stepping over dollars for dimes here. Sell the stuff for profit, and sell the truck. Buy yourself an economical car. Because odds are, it would cost you more to convert the truck to use the CVPI drive train than you'd ever see in fuel economy savings. In the Town Car, the 4.6L gets about 16mpg on the highway, and the only reason it does that well is because the body is rounded. In a 1978 F-Series truck, it wouldn't do any better than whatever was in it because those trucks are like throwing bricks through the air.


    x2
    case closed


    Case Re-Opened as a Challenger appears a 4.6 powered F-150 from the 1990;s
    _________________________
    2004 MarauderM79 155K miles Jmod!! Rockin Stock tune Daily, Muscle Merc tune for track 14.85 @95.63
    2004 Crown Vic LX SOLD!!

    New Daily 2016 Dodge Charger R/T Road and track, purchase with 16K now 23K after 3 months. 5.7 Hemi, 8 speed ZF trans 3.06 open rear 13.98 @ 99.2 mph 4740 lbs with driver!!

    R.I.P Photobucket 10 years of hosting down the drain

    Project car 74 Chevy Laguna type S-3, # match 400 SBC

    Previous rides
    93 P-71 2001 P-73, 94 TC Exec, 96 TC Signature, 04 LX

    Top
    #2289461 - 05/02/11 02:08 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    124neta Offline
    don't get riled, sugar!
    Poobah

    Registered: 04/03/09
    Posts: 6131
    Loc: Il
    ^^^they still had 4.6 2V's in the later model 150's as well. Not to mention the 4.2 that had zero balls.

    Had a truck at my old job with that POS 4.2 dont think that thing got any better gas mileage that a 4.6 would. Had a hard enough time carrying its own weight.

    Top
    #2289489 - 05/02/11 03:06 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: 124neta]
    GrandMarq9807 Offline
    Over the Hill

    Registered: 05/10/10
    Posts: 4420
    Loc: Virginia
    Originally Posted By: 124neta
    ^^^they still had 4.6 2V's in the later model 150's as well. Not to mention the 4.2 that had zero balls.

    Had a truck at my old job with that POS 4.2 dont think that thing got any better gas mileage that a 4.6 would. Had a hard enough time carrying its own weight.


    Very true, the 4.2 was dropped for the '04 models in the E series(maybe F as well?)for that very reason...
    _________________________
    1998 Grand Marquis LS. 96K mi. .. Stock
    2007 Grand Marquis GS. 90K mi. .. Stock
    1996 F-150 XLT 196K mi Beater, Stock

    ----------My Toys---------(links are up)
    1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 4-Speed
    1972 Comet GT Restomod 306, C4
    1988 Turbo Coupe 331 AOD & 3.73 .. Pressurized ½ Motor is History

    *****************NEW TOY!!!*********************
    1969 Base Fairlane 302, C4, 45K mi(really!)

    Now with P/S & PDB
    Gonna wake it up with a Blue Print headed 347




    Top
    #2290282 - 05/03/11 08:56 PM Re: 07/09 vic pi into a 78 F150 [Re: imprtslyer]
    TheDriver959 Offline
    Climber

    Registered: 07/30/08
    Posts: 644
    Loc: Oshawa, ON
    I'm not particularly trying to discourage. But I would most certainly recommend several other engines before a 4.6L 2V. I'd sell that boat anchor and invest either in a new Coyote (for more power and fuel economy) or a SBF crate engine (for simplicity). But that's just me.
    _________________________
    2004 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor
    LX Sport Console & Floor Shifter, Gentex Electrochromic Mirror w/compass, Marauder Cluster, Speed Control w/leather wheel, LED turn signals, HID headlights (projectors coming), EATC (DIY, in progress), Marauder corners, Rewired DRL, Rewired turn signals, Maraudered headlights, Grille Mounted Driving Lights, Bullitt Wheels, Pirelli Tires and a Custom Ram Air System. More to come!

    Top
    Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

    Who's Online
    3 registered (cv83, CarMon, Rootintootin), 110 Guests and 17 Spiders online.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Shout Box

    Top Posters (30 Days)
    Dmblanch 33
    Old_Guy_Stu 32
    RF_Overlord 31
    speedfreak 28
    Bellwestern80 25
    LordAeneas 24
    PrincePolaris 21
    a_d_a_m 17
    Traffic22 16
    GM_Guy 16
    Member Spotlight
    Member Since: 10/25/05
    Posts: 29128





    Copyright 2000-2015 by Crownvic.net and Steve Spaulding. All Rights Reserved.
    The photographs, graphics and data contained in this Web site are the properties of the contributors, or Crownvic.net and may not be used without expressed written consent.
    Crownvic.net is not affiliated with the Ford motor company.

    Happily consuming the fuel saved by Prius owners!